Khác biệt giữa bản sửa đổi của “Thảm sát Jallianwala Bagh”
Nội dung được xóa Nội dung được thêm vào
sk |
nKhông có tóm lược sửa đổi |
||
Dòng 21:
'''Thảm sát Jallianwala Bagh''' (hay '''thảm sát Amritsar'''), xảy ra tại vườn công viên [[Jallianwala Bagh]] ở thủ phủ [[Amritsar]] phía bắc [[Ấn Độ]] ngày 13 tháng 4 năm 1919. Người đã ra lệnh bắn vào đám đông là [[Chuẩn tướng]] [[Reginald Dyer|Reginald E.H. Dyer]].
Dyer was removed from duty and forced to retire by the House of Commons.<ref>{{cite book|last=Manchester|first=William|title=The Last Lion: Winston S Churchill, Visions of Glory (1874-1932)|publisher=Little, Brown|page=694}}</ref> He became a celebrated hero in Britain among most of the people connected to the [[British Raj]].<ref>Derek Sayer, "British Reaction to the Amritsar Massacre 1919-1920," ''Past & Present,'' May 1991, Issue 131, pp 130-164</ref> for example, the House of Lords<ref name= Tri130402/>, but unpopular in the House of Commons, that voted against Dyer twice.<ref>{{cite book|last=Manchester|first=William|title=The Last Lion : Winston Spencer Churchill, Visions of Glory (1874-1932)|publisher=Little, Brown|page=694}}</ref>The massacre caused a reevaluation of the army's role, in which the new policy became "minimum force", and the army was retrained and developed suitable tactics for crowd control.<ref>Srinath Raghaven, "Protecting the Raj: The Army in India and Internal Security, c . 1919–39," ''Small Wars and Insurgencies,'' (Fall 2005), 16#3 pp 253-279 [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09592310500220528 online]</ref> Some historians consider the episode as a decisive step towards the end of British rule in India,<ref>Brain Bond, "Amritsar 1919," ''History Today,'' Sept 1963, Vol. 13 Issue 10, pp 666-676</ref> although others believe that greater self-government was inevitable as a result of India's involvement in [[World War I]].{{citation needed|date=February 2013}}
|