MuDavid
Nội dung được xóa Nội dung được thêm vào
Corrected signatures |
|||
Dòng 5:
If it helps, I use [http://gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/ Từ Điển Tiếng Việt] to translate most words, the [http://members.microsoft.com/wincg/home.aspx?langid=1066 Microsoft Vietnamese Community Glossary] for computer-related words, and [http://www.datviet.com/tinhyeu2002/ngonngutinhyeu/noiloiyeu.htm] for names of languages.
–
:See [[User talk:Mxn#Solar system]]
Từ Điển Tiếng Việt has a number of mirrors; [http://gkws3.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/index.html
the University of Leipzig's other copy] is the one I ususally use. I actually find that TDTV has '''tons''' of math terms; see [http://gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/td?word=derivative&db=ev&db=ve&fmt=u&k=viqr] [http://gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/td?word=equation&db=ev&db=ve&fmt=u&k=viqr] [http://gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/td?word=number&db=ev&db=ve&fmt=u&k=viqr] [http://gkws0.informatik.uni-leipzig.de:8080/td?db=ev&fmt=u&pos=85992]. These math definitions are in separate entries. But I'll take a look at VDict as a backup. –
==Welcome==
Dòng 38:
:If David gives his blessing, I'm on board for the go-ahead. Personally, and I believe that this is the Wiki philosophy, I don't think I ''own'' any of those articles. More than that, in the new Trang Chính, I think the section of Toán Học should be replaced by something to present different branches of sciences, and math. Under it we can have Toán Học, Vật Lý Học, Hóa Học, Vạn Vật Học, Thiên Văn Học.... The section about cities in Viet Nam and that of different provinces should be merged into one. [[User:Mekong Bluesman]]
::That's ok by me. I don't know if my prose is really "brilliant", but with all the things [[User:Mekong Bluesman|Mekong Bluesman]] is doing, it's indeed going quite well. I've also had a look on the new ''Trang Chính'' you're making and it looks really good as it is. [[User:David|David]] [[image:Da Vit bang Chu Nom.jpg|23px|Đa vịt
David, have you taken a look at [[User:Mxn/Trang Chính 2]] yet? Any thoughts? I've modifed the design to work better in browsers like IE and fit in better with the default skin, MonoBook. (I've kept the previous new design at [[User:Mxn/Trang Chính]].) –
:I've had a look at both redesigns, and by me they both have their good points (I rather like the ''Từ điển tự do Wikipedia Tiếng Việt'' on the top of 1 and a few other details, but I prefer the general lay-out of 2). Of course if the newer one works better with IE and all that, that's even better (but me being more physicist than informatician, I can only trust you on matters like that).
:I don't think you have to worry about updating the ''tin tức'' section. On the [[:nl:Hoofdpagina|Dutch Wikipedia]] it isn't changed every day at all and it's like being "scrolled": every time something important happens in the world (i.e.: in the Netherlands and eventually in Flanders too), the new item is added on top and the oldest things at the bottom are deleted. If you don't visit Wikipedia every day and you don't have a television, hardly listen to the radio except in Taiwanese and don't understand a word of their news bulletins (like me), the news on WikipediaNL is almost always new.
:As to which of the planets should be featured first: usually it's me starting and [[User:Mekong Bluesman|Mekong Bluesman]] correcting en completing, so he'll probably have a better view on how the articles have ended. I, of course, always carefully read what he makes of it (mostly in order to learn more Việt grammatical constructions and all that, which was my original reason for coming to WikipediaVI), but you'd better ask him about that.
:Good luck. [[User:David|David]] [[image:Da Vit bang Chu Nom.jpg|23px|Đa vịt
::Yeah, the fancy header on top with ''Từ điển tự do'' is the part that doesn't work quite as well in IE. I don't know if you noticed the changes I made to the second design this morning. So currently each design has a different layout and style. We can mix-and-match. Currently I prefer the first design's style with the second design's layout (and the second design's header). Feel free to make any changes you want to the designs – or create your own!
::If we don't end up updating Tin tức very often, I think it should be called ''Thời sự'' instead, since that means "current events." And I did already ask Mekong Bluesman about the articles: see [[User talk:Mekong Bluesman#Featured article]]. –
The fancy header works well enough with the version of IE they have at Ghent University, but with the Faculty of Informatics just above my head, it might well be that is not much of a reference...
Dòng 59:
(As for creating my own ''Trang Chính'', I think I'll leave that to you. I have only recently started to understand how to make tables, so I'm not going to make rectangles in different colours and all that yet without anything to copy from. :-) )
[[User:David|David]] [[image:Da Vit bang Chu Nom.jpg|23px|Đa vịt
:Okay, on my copy of IE/Win, it's working fine; not perfect, though. There might be problems on different resolutions, where the masthead (that's what I called it) would sometimes overflow to the right of the screen, making a horizontal scrollbar appear... argh.
Dòng 67:
:If you'd like, feel free to take all the source code in my version, go to the edit page for the title you want to call your new page (please put it as a subpage under your userpage), and copy that code into the textbox there. Then you can tweak and stuff. If you need help with tables, see [[m:Help:Table]]. There's a comprehensive [[m:Help:Contents|MediaWiki User's Guide]] to help you out with the syntax.
:The table syntax often uses HTML for colors etc. (I did in my designs.) Here's a good reference for HTML codes: [http://webmonkey.wired.com/webmonkey/reference/html_cheatsheet/ Webmonkey HTML Cheatsheet]. Try and see what HTML tags work; MediaWiki accepts the basic stuff and table code too. Good luck. <code>:)</code> –
== Re: [[User talk:Mxn#Kiều|Kiều]] ==
Dòng 77:
Anyhow, Neoneurone was just trying to make the distinction between native Vietnamese speakers and people like you and I, who don't speak Vietnamese quite fluently. If I understand the phrase ''Việt kiều'' correctly, I think it's incorrect to call us that. But he's right in saying that we often make mistakes or awkward constructions, letting our native languages (like English, Dutch, German, etc.) interfere with our translation. I hope he'll be able to help us out about that. – [[User:Mxn|Minh Nguyễn]] <small class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Mxn|thảo luận]], [http://mxn.f2o.org/ blog])</small> 01:11, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
:Ah, okay. Thank you. That explains a lot. [[User:David|David]] [[image:Da Vit bang Chu Nom.jpg|23px|Đa vịt
== Re: [[User talk:Mxn#Signatures|Signatures]] ==
| |||