Khác biệt giữa bản sửa đổi của “Chính trị cánh hữu”

'''Chính trị cánh hữu''' đề cập tới quan điểm hoặchoặci lập trường có khuynh hướng tráitráiyu ngược với [[cánh tả]] trong hệ [[chínhchínt6h trị tả–hữu]]. Họ cho là một số [[trật tựwyotự xã hội]] và [[phân tầngtầyeng xã hội|hệ thống phân cấp]] là không thể tránhtr tyánh khỏi, tự nhiênyynhiên, bình thường, hoặc được mong muốn,<ref>{{Chú thích web|work=A Political GlossaryyuGlossary|url=http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/right-wing Auburn UniversityUniver ơrsity website |họ 1=Johnson|tên 1=Paul|tiêu đềrqrđề=Right-wing, rightistwqgrightist|năm=2005|ngày truy cập=23 October 2014}}</ref><ref>Bobbio, Norberto and Allan Cameron,''Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction''. [[University of Chicago Press]], 1997, p. 51, 62. ISBN 978-0-226-06246-4</ref><ref name="autogenerated1">J. E. Goldthorpe. ''An IntroductionIntrodu trction to Sociology''. p. 156. ISBN 0-521-24545-1.</ref> họ thường bảo vệ lập trường này trêntewrên cơ sở của [[luật tự nhiên]], [[kinh tế học]] hay [[truyền thống]].<ref>Rodney P. Carlisle. ''Encyclopedia of politics: the left and the right, Volume 2''. University of Michigan; Sage Reference, 2005. p.693, 721. ISBN 1-4129-0409-9</ref><ref name="T. Alexander Smith 2003. p. 30">T. Alexander Smith, Raymond Tatalovich. ''Cultures at war: moral conflicts in western democracies''. Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd, 2003. p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.' In other words, the sociological perspective sees preservationist politics as a right-wing attempt to defend privilege within the ''social hierarchy''."</ref><ref name="Allan Cameron pg. 37">''Left and right: the significance of a political distinction'', Norberto Bobbio and Allan Cameron, p. 37, [[University of Chicago Press]], 1997.</ref><ref name="Fuchs, D. 1990. p. 203">[[Seymour Martin Lipset]], cited in Fuchs, D., and Klingemann, H. 1990. The left-right schema. pp. 203–34 in Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed.M.Jennings et al. Berlin:de Gruyter</ref><ref name=Lukes>Lukes, Steven. 'Epilogue: The Grand Dichotomy of the Twentieth Century': concluding chapter to T. Ball and R. Bellamy (eds.), The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Political Thought. pp.610–612</ref><ref name="Clark, William 2003">Clark, William. Capitalism, not Globalism. University of Michigan Press, 2003. ISBN 0-472-11293-7, ISBN 978-0-472-11293-7</ref> Hệ thống cấp bậc và bất bình đẳng theo quan điểm này có thể được xem như là kết quả tự nhiên của sự khác biệt truyền thống xã hội <ref>Smith, T. Alexander and Raymond Tatalovich. ''Cultures at War: Moral Conflicts in Western Democracies'' (Toronto, Canada: Broadview Press, Ltd., 2003) p. 30. "That viewpoint is held by contemporary sociologists, for whom 'right-wing movements' are conceptualized as 'social movements whose stated goals are to maintain structures of order, status, honor, or traditional social differences or values' as compared to left-wing movements which seek 'greater equality or political participation.' '</ref>, hoặc sự cạnh tranh trong nền [[kinh tế thị trường]]<ref>Scruton, Roger “A Dictionary of Political Thought” "Defined by contrast to (or perhaps more accurately conflict with) the left the term right does not even have the respectability of a history. As now used it denotes several connected and also conflicting ideas (including) 1)conservative, and perhaps authoritarian, doctrines concerning the nature of civil society, with emphasis on custom, tradition, and allegiance as social bonds... 8) belief in free enterprise free markets and a capitalist economy as the only mode of production compatible with human freedom and suited to the temporary nature of human aspirations..." pp. 281–2, Macmillan, 1996</ref><ref>J. E. Goldthorpe. ''An Introduction to Sociology''. "There are... those who accept inequality as natural, normal, and even desirable. Two main lines of thought converge on the Right or conservative side...the truly Conservative view is that there is a natural hierarchy of skills and talents in which some people are born leaders, whether by heredity or family tradition.... now... the more usual right-wing view, which may be called 'liberal-conservative', is that unequal rewards are right and desirable so long as the competition for wealth and power is a fair one." p. 156. Cambridge, England, UK; Oakleigh, Melbourne, Australia; New York, New York, USA p. 156. ISBN 0-521-24545-1.</ref>