Wikipedia

Khác biệt giữa bản sửa đổi của “James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher”

Duyệt lịch sử tương tác
← Thay đổi trướcThay đổi sau →
Nội dung được xóa Nội dung được thêm vào
Trực quanMã wiki
Dòng 91:
| quote = Once a person has generated/bracketed part of the stream, then the activities of punctuation and connection (parsing) can occur in an effort to transform the raw data into information.}}</ref>
 
TheCâu sentencenày iscũng alsođược useddùng tođể showchứng theminh [[Semantics|semantic]]sự vaguenessmơ ofhồ thengữ wordnghĩa học của từ "had", ascũng wellnhư asđể tochứng demonstrateminh thesự [[Use–mentionkhác distinction|differencebiệt betweengiữa usingviệc a"sử worddụng" andmột mentioningtừ và sự "nhắc đến" amột word]]từ.<ref name="Lecercle">{{cite book
| last = Lecercle
| first = Jean-Jacques
Dòng 103:
| page = 86
| quote = Suppose I decide that I wish to make up a sentence containing eleven occurrences of the word 'had' in a row ...}}</ref>
It has also been used as an example of how complex language can get while still being [[syntax|syntactically]] correct.<ref name="Hollin">{{cite book
| last = Hollin
| first = Clive R.
| title = Contemporary Psychology: An Introduction
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=DTpm_oT51aQC&pg=PA34&dq=%22Had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had+had%22
| accessdate = 2009-04-30
| edition = Illustrated
| year = 1995
| publisher = [[Routledge]]
| isbn = 0-7484-0191-1
| page = 34
| quote = Do readers make use of the ways in which sentences are structured?}}</ref>
 
Jasper Fforde uses a variation of the phrase legitimately in his book ''The Well of Lost Plots'', demonstrating its potential usage within ordinary books (as well as emphasising how confusing even syntactically correct language can be):
Lấy từ “https://vi.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_while_John_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_had_a_better_effect_on_the_teacher”